Following the announcement of candidates by political parties for upcoming elections, the region has gripped into election fever. In Hunza, like other areas of the region many candidates are in the field to entitle seat to lead the people. A good news was received through one of reliable source couple of weeks ago that Youth in Gojal in consultation with the elders and common masses, chalking on walls and smooth plates on the mountains especially along the Karakorum High Way was prohibited as it puts a bad impression on visitors both domestic and international. A day before yesterday, in a meeting that held in Central Hunza, all contestants agreed to a election code of conduct that emphasizes to abstain wall chalking of any type, euphism, slang language, personal attacks, character assassination and giving harm to posters and valuables of opponent party for the larger interest in general and to to preserve peace and beauty of the region in particular. Contestants also agree verbally to avoid blame politics to get competitive advantage during election compaigns living with in the codes agreed upon consensusly. Those will served as a bridle to those enthusiastic individuals who are always ready to fight with the opponent party-thus bringing round those all emotional entities towards democratic mindset filled with patience and acceptance. The available data and common observation is revealing change of events gradually. Lets take an eye birds view on situation in Gilgit-Baltistan. Pakistan peoples party in many districts seems to face a lot of trouble until and unless it brings round in the final stage to renounce for the main candidate the specific regional committee proposes. Denial of ticket consequently has back fired and many candidates in Gilgit, three constituencies of Skardu, both constituencies of Nagar, LA-13 Astore constituency number 01, and in some other districts are contesting election as independant candidates. The resultant is that ruling party is facing a tough time as those who were unsuccessful to get party ticket have become a problem for those who succeeded to get the elction to the Gilgit Baltistan Legislative Assembly (GBLA) representation going to be held on November 12, 2009. Pakistan Peoples Party (PPP), Pakistan Muslim League (N), Pakistan Muslim League(Q), Mutahida Qaumi Movement (MQM), Karakorum National Movement (KNM), Jamat-e-Islami (J.I) and some other parties following distribution of tickets to their respective candidates have started formal election compaign to attract voters in their continuencies. Conrer meetings have been increased and public gatherings and rallies are being organized by different political parties to show their strength.
In Hunza, Pakistan Peoples Party and Muttahida Qaumi Movement, Pakistan Muslim League (N) and (Q), Karakorum National Movement and other independant candidates have initiated a regourous election compaign. Many new things are being observed in this time: the elections would be under new reform package-Gilgit Baltistan Self-empowerment and Governance order 2009, most of the candidates portraying their party head as a symbole of success, inception of different mainstream national political parties-thus creating political diversity, refrain from blame game, restriction on wall chalking to preserve natural beauty across Hunza, euphamism, more political conciousness and choice with the voters to vote to their favourite candidate. A large number of candidates are contesting election for twenty three seat of seven district in Gilgit-Baltistan.
As for as the expected raw between the candidates in the whole region are concerned, in constituency number 2 in Gilgit, political gurus predict a nail-biting raw between Hafiz Hafeez-ur-Rehman of PML(N) and Jameel Ahmed of Pakistan Peoples' Party and both are busy with election compaigns to attract voters towards their camps. A tough competition is envisioned between Imran Nadeem of PPP and MQM's Raja Azam for LA-12 in Skardu. Both have good public relations and expedited their election compaings. In Hunza, for LA-6 there are about nine candidates in the field. According to many gurus a tough competition is expected between five contestants: Wazir Baig of Pakistan Peoples Party (PPP), Kamil Jan of Mutahida Qaumi Movement (MQM), Prince Shehryar of PML (N) and Rehmat-ullah-Khan of PML (Q) and Noor Muhammad of Hunza Action Committee (HAC). Nevertheless, few say that the situation may be changed within few days followed by bargaining.
When read between the lines two new things are apparent: corporate political tendency and extensive publicity. As for as the first phenomenan is concerned, when analyzed can be further ascertained in three shapes: firstly the candidates are qualified or experienced in business techniques and secondly, able to settle scores through new techniques to tackle the situation and get the things done as they want. On the other hand we have few candidates are having an experience as political worker and know about the nounces of game in the region. While the third breed will rely on the results whatever they come. Politics is a game of chance and a candiate can face defeat as one has to win among the two in the feild. Democracy in its ugliest form is considered even more desirable even against the finest dictatorship and the election is its integral part of its processes. People should have freedom of vote for their favourite candidates.
Now a days, the people of the region are academically well qualified and know about the naunces and intricacies of politicians. It is a good time to present our due demands to our expected leadership to solve on priority basis. Nevertheless, it has been observed that youth on account of misunderstanding have been enter into mutual discord that led to quarrel. This is against the norms of our region that patronize democratic process.But it is also worthy to remember that this should not be at the cost of deterioration of our cultural values and mutual respect. Election is like a tournament and lasts for few days; we having interdependancy have to rely on each others. We hope that the new leadership will prove a binding force among the three parts of Hunza to eliminate the designs of evil forces that want to exploite every opportunity to divide and rule on us.
In the last I want to share my observations during last one and half week in the region in the form of Urdu verses. This is the first poetry that may gramatically incorrect but can be read as my personal feelings.
Editor
Kerry Lugger Mess-what ails us
In truth, it was first time that people had a previllege to listen some national issues living in own domestic problems. Before entering into discussion lets take a bird's eye view of nature of relations of USA with Pakistan since its creation. Pakistan and US has a diversified rather varied history of mutual relationship that some times changed from warm to cold with respective to global circumstances and scenario.By 1950, Pakistan signed a treaty with US for military alliance and security. Our expectations of in time reinforcement from America fell a pray of betrayal when she declare to be nuetral during 1965 and 1971 wars with India. The invasion of USSR on Afghanistan initiated a new chapter of mutual relations. Seeing a good partner, Washington wanted to expliot the opportunity providing hundreds of million dollars in the form of aid to make the Russia run away. This aid was provided with amendments: Symington, Pele and Pressler amendments, relevant and aimed to stall nuclear programme of the country. Yet with the passage of time restrictions and conditions against the nuclear progress were overlooked as the alliance of Pakistan was more vital for American goepolitcal interests. Now we come to the point that is Kerry Loggar Bill presented by American Senate to Pakistan. The bill has created an extesive debate in various circles of the life. Lets see what Kerry Loggar Law really is? Joe Biden, a candidate for presidential elections last year planned comparatively unique policy with Pakistan introducing modern dynamics in the relationship pattern with larger emphasis on socio-economic and political development via aid package. Joe presented the bill in the Senate an aid package of $ 1.5 billion for next five years period that is renewable with the addition of about one billion dollar for the next more five years. The aid is like a dividen given for securing democracy and performance based assistance to military establishment with a comprehesive system of accountiblity. When Obama administration took charge of government after a slight exercise Biden-Luggar bill was renamed as Kerry Loggar bill and formally known as Enhanced partnership with Pakistan Act of 2009. The main clauses of philosophy of democracy remained unchaged.Yet, the phenomenon of dividend against security of democracy was deleted as American were well aware about the credibility of an NRO infacted Zardari government.Some clauses especially section 203 has been coded with inappropriate worded conditionalities attached for military aid and state security. Section 302 calls for semi-annual monitoring reports submission and assessment to the extent that the government exercises effectively civilian control over military and oversight of civilian and political leadership, approval of military budget, process of chain of command, decentralization of authorities, machanism of promotion of military top leadership, civilian involvement in strategic planning and military existance in civil administration. one of the most important certification clause in other critical conditionalities is country's better coorperation to dismentle nuclear proliferation net words and permission to access people alleged to involved in it in past. Some of very important conditions including elimination of terrorist groups, operational base camps and their networks in Balochistan and Punjab, to cease apparent support by intelligence agencies to terrorists, prhohibiting Taliban and its affiliated militant groups to use its land against other countries. The clear message is that Pakistan has to prove that it is no more heaven of Al-Qaida and other extremist groups. Another important condition kept is to assure congress that security forces of Pakistan willnot involved to subvert political and judicial processes in the country. There is still controversy regarding the status of aid bill. Pro government analysts says that passage of Kerry Lugar Bill is a historic development on part of our government for US has hardly shown such a generous attiude since creation of Pakistan using social development policy dynamics. The situation is still complex as top bras leadership of armed forces expressed their concerns over certain clauses of bill related to military aid on specific conditions. Top brass military leaders expressed their due concerns and made their opinion public for they knew the country is being sidelined. In public circles rumours are compromise on national soverienty.
On the other hand Foreign Minister Shah Mehmood Qureshi speaking to a press confrence with Hillary Clinton, US secretary state in Islamabad a couple of days earlier said that we are observing a tangible policy shift from an individual to the people of Pakistan. The doubts remain as it is because facts remain as they are. Large number of analysts, editors and political experts have put the light from different angles. The bill has done nothing good to relations of both history as there is nothing unusual with aid relevant conditions. Every concept of foreign assistance imply mutually focused objectives of recipient and donor states keeping in view priorities in socio-economic, political, military and cultural arena. Historical records are evident that many plans like that of Marshal plan had many conditionalities binding on state in past. Such situations needs extensive home work, before introduction and what I see is lack of proper prior home work on the bill by rulling party too.
Here exists some vaxing ground realities to consider in the country. If the assessment is caried out keeping in view efficiency and transparancy will show the scarcity of credibility and eligiblity to exercise command on military. Moreover, there are certain useless conditions like that of appointment of topbrass military leadership. Even a child of the country knows that such appointments need approval of head of state throgh a formal process. Nevertheless there are some questions in our mind whether these conditions in the interest of our country? why people are politicizing it making hue and cry? whether training camps are in the interest of Pakistan? Is the elimination of extrimism from the country not our prime objective? The simple answer is absolutely positive-these all conditions are the geniune demand of the people of Pakistan who want to continue democratic process, avoid military to topple representitive regimes, elimination of terrorist origins and their existance. The existing ontroversy, otherwise, may create a gulf among political, civil and military with unpredictable implications. So, consensus is need of hour for the confrontation with Washington does not benefit Pakistan.
One of the other major deficiency in the Kerry Luggar Bill is unsound or inappropriate mechanism of reporting suggested by the donor agencies that will hardly help to get objectives. Development assistance always brings a series of profound challenges and security related issues. If the USA is keen to improve its relationship as a sincere friend of Pakistan then the political realities should be kept in mind while priroritizing things. The propose reporting and operational mechanism will no benefit for the poor class which is the actual philosophy behind assistance.
So, the real challenge can be to utilize whatever we get in form of assistance for social and economic upliftment of common man. It is expected that the aid would not destine to adorn the pockets of political elite and establishment, rather, it should serve as a catalyst for vital socio-economic change for which a common man dreams for in the country.
Editor
0 comments